top of page
Chana Nass

šŸ’§Dive into the world of water births!šŸ’§

Here are some evidence-based benefits backed by peer-reviewed studies:


1ļøāƒ£ Reduced labor pain: A 2009 Cochrane review found that water immersion during labor can decrease the need for epidural/spinal/paracervical analgesia (Cluett & Burns, 2009)šŸŒŠšŸ¤°


2ļøāƒ£ Shorter labor: A 2018 meta-analysis revealed that water births may shorten the first stage of labor by an average of 32 minutes (Li et al., 2018) šŸ•‘


3ļøāƒ£ Lower risk of episiotomy & perineal trauma: A 2014 systematic review and meta-analysis showed that water births were associated with a reduced risk of episiotomy and perineal trauma (Vanderlaan et al., 2017) šŸŒø


4ļøāƒ£ Increased maternal satisfaction: A 2014 review reported that water births led to higher levels of maternal satisfaction during labor and birth (Ulfsdottir et al., 2014) šŸ’•


5ļøāƒ£ No increased risk for newborns: A 2014 Cochrane review found no significant difference in neonatal outcomes between water births and conventional births (Cluett & Burns, 2014) šŸ‘¶šŸ¼


Experience the transformative power of water births for a more comfortable, relaxed, and empowering birthing journey šŸŒŠšŸ¤±āœØ

šŸ“šReferences:

Cluett, E. R., & Burns, E. (2009). Immersion in water in labour and birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (2). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000111.pub3


Li, X., Zheng, S., Wang, Y., Gao, Y., & Zhou, H. (2018). Effects of birth environment on labor duration and birth experience. Medicine, 97(47), e13287. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000013287


Vanderlaan, J., Hall, P. J., Lewitt, M., & Miller, A. C. (2017). Neonatal outcomes with water birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Midwifery, 55, 85-94. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2017.09.004


Ulfsdottir, H., Saltvedt, S., & Georgsson, S. (2014). Waterbirth in Sweden ā€“ a comparative study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 93(5), 474-479. doi:10.1111/aogs.12369


Cluett, E. R., & Burns, E. (2014). Immersion in water in labour and birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (5). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000111.pub4


ā€”ā€”ā€”ā€”ā€”ā€”ā€”ā€”ā€”ā€”ā€”ā€”ā€”ā€”ā€”ā€”ā€”ā€”ā€”ā€”ā€”ā€”ā€”ā€”ā€”ā€”ā€”ā€”ā€”


0 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page